![]() When I listen from the PC I use Sound forge will DR work with it? All the while they are sure Pandora is good enough for them. You would have to sit them down and make them listen to the 2 versions and after you point out the differences maybe they will change the minds. I believe most people will fall for the louder is better way of mastering. Some records sounded great compressed and others like sh*t. I came up with a sort of one click solution and all my new records got processed that way. The CD clearly sounded fuller there was a significant amount of bass that was less present on the LP. After comparing a mobile fidelity remastered cd of Crosby Stills and Nash to my raw recording of the LP. I use sound forge 10.0 and use an Isotopes 3.0 plugin to compress or maximize the levels. Last year I developed a new hobby of buying used records and remastering them to 24/96 files. I can’t really add too much at this time except that in a different way this tool will be very useful for me. I'd still love to get an all in one out of the box solution that offers another column in the "Analyse Audio" data table. This is my individual choice and I respect the choice of others who don't want to use it for their own reasons. In the case of the DR Meter, it's for these reasons that I'm putting it to use. in this sense, make the model / measure the simplest that it can be but no simpler - and why I agree with various comments that the use of any measure as an absolute is unwise.īut having some measure that has a level of credibility and universality that can be used as a guide for screening, is potentially a great tool. That is why the principle of Occam's razor is relevant: I am also glad that the majority of my music collection is pre-noughties Loudness nonsense.Īlso bear in mind that any measure of this ilk is attempting to model quantitatively a subjective effect. I'd disagree that the "Loudness War" can be referred to in the past tense, my view is that it's still raging. It's handy to work with a standard measurement scale that you can use to check whether your music has been squished into a boomy audio format or has been mastered with a sensible appreciation for good sound and listening pleasure. With the online database that's available: However I prefer the wider spread of the DR meter being on a 20 point scale as opposed to MC's intensity with 5. Please note that MC does provide a DR equivalent as "Intensity" that is included in "Analyse Audio", as I discovered here: I would much rather have this happen all in MC because that is my preferred platform. ![]() Yet another job to add to the progressive tidy up of tags and album art. I'm progressively rating my collection for dynamic range and using this to weed out the chaff from the good stuff. However, being into instant gratification and wanting to avoid another registration process, I downloaded (and may the MC higher power not strike me down as I type this ) foobar2000 and found the DR meter plugin out there on the web that integrates with FB2K. Why wait until MC19? Make this function an MC18 deal is my vote. (This could be run as part of "analyze audio" in MC) Here are the specifications for the TT Dynamic Range Offine Meter (Software): To protect the integrity of the DR system the DR Meter has been registered for a world patent, which is pending. ![]() It is very important that every DR display always shows identical values under all circumstances. There will maybe a small service fee charged for testing and consultation of your final implementation. Please be aware that using the term "DR Meter" or "Dynamic Range Meter," as well as the use of the DR logo is only permitted after we have tested the implementation and have issued written approval. In other words, they can be used by any developer and programmer who would like to integrate a DR display within a meter or who would like to program their own meter. The specifications of the TISCHMEYER TECHNOLOGY DYNAMIC RANGE METER are open source.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |